FAKE SELF-DETERMINATION OF PEOPLES AS THE INSTRUMENT OF RUSSIAN AGGRESSION
Keywords:
people; self-determination; remedial secession; international law; territorial integrity of state; political unity of state;aggression; Russian aggression against UkraineAbstract
The article exploring the main pseudo-legal justification for the covert and later open invasion of the Russian Federation into Ukraine, the ‘protection of the will of the peoples of Ukraine’. This official position and propaganda thesis regarding the falsification of the ‘self-determination of the peoples of Ukraine’ could not be neglected as worthless and void because it is well-thought-out, aimed at leveling the efforts of Ukraine to gain international support in countering aggression, raising the objections of states, especially non-Western ones, and rejecting any international collective sanctions. The author shows that the Russian thesis is groundless because according to any international legal criterias there are no regional peoples in Ukraine that could have a right for self-determination, and the latter never occurred. The more difficult issue situated in the ‘gray zone’ of international law is a ‘remedial secession’, but even this ambiguous concept is inapplicable to Ukrainian realities because the state powers equally represent the population of the state and no repressive policy is implemented toward a group or a region.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.