REASONABLE ACCOMMODATION FOR MENTAL DISORDERS: THE CASE OF PUBLIC SCHOOL HEADMASTERS
Abstract
This article examines the legal contours of disability-based discrimination in employment, with particular emphasis on the employer’s duty to provide reasonable accommodation under European and Czech law. It undertakes a doctrinal analysis of the relevant legal framework, drawing upon the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the Supreme Court of the Czech Republic. The study subsequently narrows its focus to a specific institutional context—namely, the position of headmasters within public schools operating under the Czech regional education system. This focus is justified by the distinctive legal status of headmasters, who occupy a dual role vis-à-vis the employing legal entity and the school’s founding authority. The article seeks to determine whether Czech legislation clearly delineates the entity responsible for implementing reasonable accommodation in such cases. It further assesses the compatibility of the national legal framework with international and EU standards on non-discrimination and equal treatment. Particular attention is paid to the procedural and substantive dimensions of the accommodation obligation, including its scope, limits, and enforceability. The analysis also explores the potential forms that reasonable accommodation may take, considering the managerial and pedagogical functions of school headmasters. The article argues that the current legal regulation lacks sufficient clarity and may give rise to legal uncertainty and inconsistent application. It concludes by proposing interpretative and legislative recommendations aimed at enhancing legal certainty and ensuring effective protection of the rights of persons with disabilities in educational leadership roles.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.