COOPERATIVE SAVINGS ASSOCIATIONS IN CZECH HISTORY AND THEIR POSITION IN THE MODERN CZECH FINANCIAL SECTOR
Keywords:
cooperative savings associations, cooperatives Act, František Cyril Kampelík, Friedrich W. Raiffeisen, czech financial sector, moral hazardAbstract
The article first describes the history and legal regulation of cooperative savings associations in Czech lands since the second half of the 19th century. The initial regulatory issues were resolved by the Cooperatives Act No. 70/1873 ř.z. [Imperial Code], complemented by Act No. 133/1903 ř.z. [Imperial Code]. Historically there were two types of cooperative savings associations: (a) the Schulze-Delitzsch type and (b) the Raiffeisen type, or “Kampelička” [savings and loan association]. Cooperative savings associations expanded throughout central Europe, and in Czechoslovakia they existed also between the world wars. The communist regime after 1948 cancelled the cooperative savings associations and transferred their assets to a single state-owned financial institution. In the middle of the 1990s the efforts to restore the sector of cooperative savings associations culminated in the enactment of Act No. 87/1995 Sb. [Collection of Laws]. Lack of continuity of ownership relations, poor legal regulation and insufficient supervision resulted in the cooperative savings associations not being a positive complement to the sector of financial services similarly to Austria and Germany; on the contrary they represent a risk to the development of the Czech financial sector. In 1999 there were 127 cooperative savings associations, and later there was the first wave of insolvencies. In 2004 the rules for operation of cooperative savings associations became much stricter, and since 2006 they are under supervision of the Czech National Bank. Currently there are 12 cooperative savings associations active in the Czech Republic and they cover less than one per cent of the entire banking sector, however in case of possible financial difficulties they may jeopardise the trustworthiness of the entire financial sector and draw from the Deposit Insurance Fund.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.