FREE MOVEMENT OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS IN THE EU
Main Article Content
Abstract
A number of legislative instruments are in force, providing for mechanisms for a Member Stateof the EU to seek the collection of admissible evidence in criminal matters in a cross-border context. The paper deals with the instruments that are involved in the concept of the free movement of evidence in criminal matters in the EU and answers the question whether it does work. First, it focuses on the development from mutual legal assistance to mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters in the EU. Second, it deals with the current procedural instruments
–an Order freezing property or evidence and a European evidence warrant. Third, it analyses legislative development in this field– a European investigation order.
Mutual legal assistance, Mutual recognition of judicial decisions in criminal matters in the EU,
Order freezing property or evidence, European evidence warrant, European investigation order.
1. INTRODUCTION
Jeremy Bentham:
“
.”1
We all use evidence every day. For example, we might look out the window
to see what the weather is like and use this evidence to decide what to wear, or
scientists conduct experiments and use the evidence to find cures for diseases.
Police investigators also try to gather as much evidence as possible. The judge
hears all the evidence and decides if the defendant is guilty.
2
‘
’
3
250
The
)
. Free movement of evidence appears to be one of the goals
within the establishment of that area and an essential element to fight efficiently
against cross-border and organized crime. As pointed out by the European
Commission, closer co-operation in this field is a key to the effectiveness of
criminal investigations and proceedings in the EU.
Area of freedom,
security and justice
) Thus, a wide
range of things and many types of documents can be used as evidence.
The EU set itself the objective the establishment of an
)
Evidence is the basis of justice:
exclude evidence, you exclude justice
Article Details
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.