ALTERNATIVE RESOLUTION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DISPUTES
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article deals with the alternative dispute resolution as a perspective and proper way on how to settle disputes and why it is proper for an intellectual property dispute settlement also as an amicable method.
The author comments on the different approaches to the alternative dispute resolution in different jurisdictions (should it be also the arbitration the alternative dispute resolution method or not and why).
The nature of the alternative dispute resolution and its roots are analysed briefly, then the methods of the alternative dispute resolution are described individually to find if and why individuals may benefit from it when properly used. The best international practice and its promotion from relevant authorities and agencies (like WIPO and UNIPO) is reminded and described as well.
Author also comments on special elements of the intellectual property disputes and its typology in the “new technology governed and connected world”. Under consideration are especially the costs and benefits of an alternative dispute resolution and the author suggests, based on relevant arguments (both jurisprudence and practise provided) and thus concludes the alternative disputes settlement should be considered as a perspective way how to settle a dispute and it should be promoted and used widely as international practice shows and confirms its advantages.
Article Details
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.