PERSONALIZATION BEYOND CONVENIENCE: NAVIGATING PRIVACY AND PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ISSUES
Abstract
Personalization is widely promoted as a mechanism for enhancing consumer convenience and relevance. Yet, its underlying data practices increasingly raise concerns about individual autonomy and privacy. This article examines how personalization systems operate across personal, non-personal, and inferred data. It argues that these forms of data processing can interfere with informational, decisional, and psychological dimensions of privacy. Building on analysis of European privacy and data protection law and judicial practice, this article highlights conceptual tensions between personalization and the GDPR, particularly regarding the legal status and oversight of inferred and non-personal data. It demonstrates that current data protection safeguards insufficiently address the privacy risks stemming from personalization techniques that influence users’ choices, perceptions, and behaviour without relying solely on personal data processing. With regards to possible harms, this article also analyses personalization as potential automated decision-making under Article 22 GDPR. The article concludes that understanding and mitigating the privacy challenges of personalization requires moving beyond legal definitions of personal data to consider the broader ways in which digital systems shape autonomy and decision-making.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright and originality of the offered manuscript
1. It is assumed that the manuscript offered has not been previously published. It is expected that the authors will inform the editorial board of TLQ if the entire manuscript, its parts or some relevant results have been previously published in a different publication at the level of an article in a reviewed scientific magazine or monograph. Should the editorial board of TLQ conclude that this condition was not fulfilled the review process may be terminated.
2. It is assumed that the submitted manuscript is an original academic work. If that is not the case the author needs to provide information regarding all circumstances that could raise doubts whether the manuscript is the outcome of original research.
3. By submitting the manuscript the author acknowledges that after the publication in The Lawyer Quarterly her/his work will be made available online to the Internet users and also kept by the Library of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. Author's rights to further use the work remain unabridged.